Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

religious studies

  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Where is religiosity growing, where is it receding, and what does that tell us?: Sociologists

    The data that made nobody happy Pew’s 2015 report projected that by 2050, the global share of religiously unaffiliated people will decline from 16 percent to 13 percent. Not because people are deconverting less, but because secular populations have far fewer children....
    sociology
    political science
    religious studies
    demography
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What does the West owe to Christianity and Islam?: Catholic Social Teaching

    Pray and work In 529, Benedict of Nursia established a monastery at Monte Cassino and wrote a Rule. Welcome every stranger as Christ. Feed the hungry. Tend the sick. Preserve the books. Work with your hands....
    religious studies
    catholic social teaching
    western civilization
    medieval history
    interfaith relations
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What does the West owe to Christianity and Islam?: Complexity historians

    The monk who smuggled numerals In 976, al-Khwarizmi’s work on Hindu-Arabic numerals reached a Catalan monastery through Gerbert of Aurillac, a monk who had studied in Islamic Iberia. Gerbert became Pope Sylvester II....
    religious studies
    history of science
    historiography
    islamic history
    medieval european history
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What does the West owe to Christianity and Islam?: Civilizational inheritors

    The line from Aquinas Aquinas died in 1274. He synthesized Aristotelian logic with Christian theology, established natural law, articulated just war doctrine, and laid groundwork for the scientific method....
    religious studies
    intellectual history
    history of western civilization
    medieval studies
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What does the West owe to Christianity and Islam?: The Story

    The surgeon who doesn’t know In 1088, students in Bologna organized themselves into a universitas — a legal corporation with elected rectors and the right to grant degrees. The model spread to Paris, Oxford, Cambridge. Every one was a Church institution. The faculty were clergy....
    religious studies
    intellectual history
    history of science
    medieval history
    history of christianity and islam
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What is God?: Mystics

    The thing that happens We are not going to argue about it. We are going to describe it. You are sitting — or walking, or washing dishes, or in one documented case being struck by lightning — and the boundary between you and everything else dissolves. Not metaphorically....
    religious studies
    mysticism
    neuroscience
    philosophy of religion
    psychology of religion
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What makes learning about the ultimate easier in the modern era, and what makes it harder?: Integralists

    The spectrum In 1977, Ken Wilber proposed something either outrageously presumptuous or quietly obvious: the world’s wisdom traditions are not in contradiction. They are describing different stages of the same developmental sequence....
    spirituality
    integral theory
    religious studies
    comparative religion
    perennial philosophy
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What makes learning about the ultimate easier in the modern era, and what makes it harder?: Religious traditionalists

    Thirty years under the Rule Our abbot entered the monastery at twenty-three. He has prayed the same liturgical hours, in the same chapel, with the same brothers, through three decades of silence and chanting and manual labor and the slow erosion of every spiritual fantasy he...
    spirituality
    religious studies
    religious education
    monasticism
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What makes learning about the ultimate easier in the modern era, and what makes it harder?: The Story

    Ten thousand people in silence In 2003, a Burmese meditation teacher named S. N. Goenka filled Madison Square Garden with ten thousand people sitting in silence. Most had found their way there through a website....
    meditation and mindfulness
    religious studies
    technology and society
    comparative religion
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What is enlightenment?: Skeptics

    The epistemological problem In 1901, the Canadian psychiatrist Richard Maurice Bucke published Cosmic Consciousness, cataloguing thirty-six cases of higher awareness. His evidence consisted entirely of first-person reports. The book was a bestseller....
    religious studies
    epistemology
    philosophy of mind
    consciousness studies
    neuroscience
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    What is enlightenment?: Neuroscientists

    Off the chart In 2004, we put Matthieu Ricard in a scanner. A molecular biologist who left the Pasteur Institute to become a Tibetan monk, 50,000 hours of practice....
    psychology
    religious studies
    consciousness studies
    neuroscience
    meditation and contemplative practice
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Does the universe have a purpose?: Materialists

    The love letter to an empty house In 1977, Voyager 1 launched carrying a golden record with greetings in fifty-five languages, music by Bach and Chuck Berry, and a diagram showing how to find Earth....
    philosophy
    sociology
    religious studies
    evolutionary biology
    cosmology
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Is tradition a resource, a trap, or something else?: Dialecticians

    The tea ceremony changed with every generation Okakura published The Book of Tea in 1906 describing a ceremony already transformed multiple times since Sen no Rikyu’s fifteenth-century version....
    sociology
    cultural studies
    religious studies
    history
    cultural anthropology
    Comments
    0
  • Z

    Second Coming <--> Positive Singularity <--> Steel-UpTrust? pt 2.  

    Link to part 1: https://uptrusting.com/post/LN01VP

    Note: Originally written for the participants of the AI alignment X spirituality/metaphysics retreats I’ve co-hosted with Jordan and Anna Salamon, so there may be some references to ideas or people you don’t know. 

    Intellectual foundations for the unity of religions

    Buddhism says there is no God, whereas the Abrahamic faiths are centered on God. Eastern religions say there’s reincarnation, whereas Abrahamic religions don’t. Catholicism espouses the doctrine of the trinity, whereas Islam and Eastern Orthodox reject it. How can there possibly be unity among the world religions? 

    A core thesis of mine is that:

    • doctrinal differences like these tend to result from natural language being insufficiently precise for reasoning about questions like these. Is light a wave, or is light a particle? English-language debate won’t help in the slightest, but the question dissolves immediately once we have the mathematics of quantum mechanics. 

    • there is undiscovered mathematics that could likewise dissolve the most significant doctrinal disputes across religions. 

    Through the discovery of calculus, Isaac Newton revolutionized the field of natural philosophy, the branch of philosophy concerned with understanding the natural world, to such an extent that it was rebranded as a field of science called "physics". I think we are at the cusp of discovering a new branch of mathematics that can do for metaphysics – the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of consciousness, the relationship between mind and matter, and the nature of identity, among other things – what calculus did for natural philosophy. 

    Our current ontology for metaphysics (and our conceptions of "true", "good", "exist", "self", "continuity of experience", "the territory") are at least as confused as Aristotle's ontology of physics, and the de-confused versions of metaphysical concepts might look radically different from our current intuitive conceptions of these concepts, much like Newton's ontology for physics looks radically different from Aristotle's. 

    I think the development of mathematical metaphysics could serve as a Rosetta stone for world religions. Based on my current understanding of religion, it seems likely to me that there are principles that can be stated and proven in the language of this new math, grounded in precise deconfused articulations of metaphysical concepts, like:

    The timeless life principle: with the right ontological primitives for thinking about personal identity and continuity of experience (which should, among other things, deconfuse anthropics and quantum physics), we can precisely describe how "the bearer of our experience" / "who we really are":

    • is distinct from our mind, body, and whatever the referent of "I" or "me" intuitively appears to be

    • does not exist within space or time (and, rather, exists "wherever it is" that the Pythagorean theorem exists)

    • does not depend on a material information processor (like a brain, or a computer running brain emulations)

    • is grounded in neither mind nor matter, but in whatever the monistic substance of dual-aspect monism is

    • does not begin when we are born, and does not end when we die 

    The karma principle: "what goes around comes around" can be expressed as a conservation law that is as precise and as exacting as the law of the conservation of energy (such that seeming injustice in the world can be chalked up to us not knowing how to carve up the world in the right ways, just like someone might think that the potential energy in a coiled-up spring mysteriously disappears when it dissolves in acid if they don't know to track the temperature increase in the acid).

    The "one soul" principle: from the perspective of the "true self" (as described in the timeless life principle), it's in everybody's self-interest to act as though something like The Egg is true. 

    Fortunately, I think a majority of the metaphysical heavy lifting in figuring out this math has already been done by a man named Chris Langan, who’s put together a coherent theory of everything, the CTMU, that appears to transcend and include every insight I’ve encountered along my metaphysical journey (whether from MIRI, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, David Bohm, near-death experiences, life-between life hypnotherapy sessions…) Much of my thinking in this section has actually been inspired by Chris Langan, who has written about how a metareligion could facilitate a positive singularity. 

    A mathematical Rosetta stone for world religions would certainly not be sufficient to eradicate religious conflict. Exclusivist interpretations of religions (“our religions have an exclusive claim to truth and salvation”), which are the majority today, will never be compatible with each other. However, a mathematical Rosetta stone for world religions would significantly bolster the clout of religious pluralists, who take the view that no one religion has an exclusive claim to truth or salvation, that there are fundamental convergences around ethics and around the claims found in mystical traditions, that these convergences are more important than the many substantial contradictions across different religions' doctrines, and that the different world religions are best thought of as different paths up the same mountain. 

    I had a strong visceral update when I attended the Parliament of World Religions in August 2023 and met a bunch of pluralist priests, imams, and rabbis, who all seemed to have interpretations of religion that roughly matched my own, who all seemed to be walking the walk of religious ethics, and who all expressed that their views, while perhaps still not widely accepted among those of their faith, fell squarely within nuanced interpretations of the doctrines of their faith. (I’ve since learned that the Vatican described the Buddha as a great healer, and that the Quran explicitly says that genuine followers of Christianity and Judaism have nothing to fear!) Two Catholic priests congratulated me for my experience of Jesus Christ on ayahuasca, and an imam I met suggested on his own accord that an aligned superintelligent AI could be reasonably interpreted as the messianic figure of Islam. 

    The overall experience felt like a religious analogue of meeting top scientists at a metascience conference who all cherish the ideals of science, but also agree that modern science is broken in crucial ways (with the replication crisis as a particularly salient example), contrary to most mainstream perceptions of science. 

    In his book Waking Up, Sam Harris criticized those who believe in the unity of religion by noting that the vast majority of adherents to Abrahamic religions take exclusivist interpretations, and that the pluralists are small in number, have little political clout, and are often rejected by their religious institutions. I would counter that the supermajority of exclusivist interpretations is a contingent fact, not something intrinsic to the nature of religion, and that a mathematical Rosetta stone for religions, combined with changing political incentives, could shift institutionalized religion toward pluralism. 

    Perhaps counterintuitively, scientific skeptics seem particularly well-suited to leading the unification of religions, in part because the scientific virtues of rationality, empiricism, and skepticism are sorely needed for the proper interpretation of religion; in part because scientists have some of the most epistemic power in today’s day and age; and in part because their historical atheism would make their shift in perspective radically persuasive, just as the conversion of Paul the Apostle – a well-respected Roman and well-respected Jew who had spent his life persecuting Christians, but ended up converting to Christianity – was what led Christianity to really take off.

    With this all said, what might a third attractor predicated on the unity of religions actually look like? 

    Link to part 3: https://uptrusting.com/post/lQlWYP

    #FutureYouLove

    zhukeepa@gmail.com•...

    Ah, thanks for the correction. Looking more into this, it seems like they did split over a doctrinal dispute over the trinity, but it seems like I got some of the details wrong here. 

    religious studies
    christian theology
    church history
    Comments
    0
  • Elohimist avatar

    The Born Again Gospel .  The Born Again Gospel

    You are a created being, made in the image of a Holy God but, no one on Earth can be Holy so, God sent His Only Begotten Son Jesus, to take the punishment for our sins by dying on a cross. He was placed in a tomb and on the third day His God and Father raised Him from the dead and exalted Him to the Throne of Heaven. God has made this Jesus, whom they crucified, both Lord and Christ. And, Jesus: The Son of Man, will return to take us to be with Him forever and ever. Amen. 

    Romans 10:8-13

    ...“The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming: that if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” And, believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with your heart you believe and are justified And, with your mouth you confess and are saved.

    It is just as the Scripture says: “Anyone who believes in Him will never be put to shame.” For there is no difference between a Jew or a gentile, for the same Lord is Lord of all, and gives richly to all who "call" on Him, for, “Everyone who "calls" on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

    John 3:3

     Jesus replied, “Truly I tell you! No one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again.”

    Becoming Born Again is 'known' by The Initial Evidence of The Holy Spirit. 

    1st Corinthians 12:3

     Therefore, I inform you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus be cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy Spirit.

    1st Corinthians 14:1 

    Earnestly pursue "love", (Galatian 5:22,23 The Fruit of the Holy Spirit is Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self control.) and earnestly desire spiritual gifts, (1st Corinthians 12-14) and especially that you might prophesy.

    Luke 11:13 Therefore if you, being evil, know to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the Father who is in Heaven give the Holy Spirit, to those who 'ask' Him."

    Here is an example prayer.

    Almighty God and Father, I believe You raised your Son Jesus from the dead. Please forgive me of all my sins and fill me with Your Holy Spirit so I can bear good fruit and do Your will, in the name of Jesus my Lord and Christ. Amen. Thank you Father God, Thank you Lord Jesus. Halleluyah!

    Matthew 6:8-15 

    Nevertheless, the firm foundation of God stands, having this seal, "The Lord knows those who are His," and, "Everyone who names the name of the Lord is to abstain from wickedness." 2nd Timothy 2:19

    My name is Arnold J. Bur and I am an Elohimist.

    Elohimists.com
    curiousdwk•...
    No.  Nothing in the Bible is a "verifiable fact":  Not the  story of creation, or of Jonah and the whale or any story within the Bible.  The Bible is book of stories with wisdom and morals but not facts....
    philosophy
    religious studies
    theology
    Comments
    0
  • B

    No other choice. If it is indeed wrong to say out loud that I do not trust Jews anymore, then that will just have to be something I learn to live with like I do genocide, ethnic cleansing, pedophilia and the deliberate murder of world central kitchen and other aid workers. Israel is a savage and degenerate ally, a child killing lying thieving nation state , a menace to all of humanity and friend to no one...Especially Americans!

    curiousdwk•...
    To me, there is a difference between stating facts about the State of Israel and generalizations about Jews.  I am against Zionism as displayed in the Israeli government, but I am not against Jews....
    political science
    religious studies
    middle eastern studies
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    AMA with John Mackey. Wednesday, 2/11 at 2:00 PM CT

    We’re here to talk about A Course in Miracles, and The Disappearance of the Universe, and how we can help each other home with the practices of true forgiveness.

    John Mackey is well known as the co-founder of Whole Foods (and CEO for 44 years), innovator in Conscious Capitalism (including creating billion dollar company while changing food systems for the better, implementing executive salary caps, radical health care and employee wellness programs, etc,) and most recently founder of Love.life - a cutting edge medicine, nutrition, fitness, center w/ pickleball, cafe. 

     

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=5GVmvrPQgD4
    peteSA•...

    What's the core difference between ACIM and Buddhism?

    religious studies
    buddhism
    comparative religion
    acim (a course in miracles)
    Comments
    0
  • F

    Engage or Enrage. It is likely that we have family members or friends that we differ with greatly when it comes to politics, healthcare, etc.  I am no different.  When the inevitable hot topic arises, do you recommend flight or fight, engage or enrage?  How do you respond when this occurs?

    Elohimist•...

    I share the Truth but everyone has their own interpretation because of ignorance and false teachers.

    Unfortunately we are divided. We are supposed to be united. A like-minded body of Christ. 

    religious studies
    theology
    Comments
    0
  • Elohimist•...

    The Born Again Gospel

    The Born Again Gospel You are a created being, made in the image of a Holy God but, no one on Earth can be Holy so, God sent His Only Begotten Son Jesus, to take the punishment for our sins by dying on a cross....
    religious studies
    theology
    christianity
    Comments
    12
  • TheWorldsMayor•...
    Something clicked while I was writing this and I had to share it with you. The Greek word for "meek" was literally used to describe a trained warhorse — not a broken animal. Power under control. That's what Jesus was actually talking about....
    religious studies
    linguistics
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...